Re: Lone's commentary on the incident report.

Zolar's testimony wouldn't convict, but let's be clear: from security's perspective, there isn't anything to convict Bart of as far as the bathroom vignette goes. Security doesn't know he tried to hide his sensor image. Security doesn't know he has/had a disruptor pistol. All security knows is that a young teen aged male streaker is hiding in a female bathroom (well, Zolar knows Bart is fixing his makeup).

However, Zolar's telepathy (to be fair, Todd plays it as empathy) would place the suspect at the location at the time of the sensor glitch which, as Lone says, while circumstantial (i.e. "not considered definite evidence" ) would give security cause to further investigate.

The thinking here is that security places Bart at the location of the sensor glitch > investigation of computer and sensor systems > investigation of Lisa Flanders > if sufficient evidence is found, Ra'zii will formally add computer tampering/ID fraud to Bart's charges.

And then there's the investigation of:

a) how Bart got hold of Ralph's dad's access codes (for his escape and stealing the parts, which may end up with Ralph getting a Conspiracy/accessory to commit ID fraud charge).
b) how the tribbles got there (if Starfleet considers tribbles as much of an ecological pest as the Klingons, Sam may be in trouble for setting even a few loose. Maybe she'll turn around and pin it in Bart in due course)
c) the Klingon's weapon (is it legal, given how much trouble Counsellor McKnight had getting a knife through security, and does Bart fire it when it was given to him?), if Mike brings it back up
d) Bart getting Nelson to replicate tribble poison using his dad's access codes (Nelson could be caught in Conspiracy to distribute restricted materials and ID fraud (for using someone else's access codes) charges himself), if Mike brings that back

This is barely the act 1 break in a 4 act show, so everyone needs to stop jumping to convictions, court dates and closing the case file.